|
Music Technology Labs: Getting Their Classes Wired
by John Kuzmich Jr. |
Computer
music labs have always appealed to me especially when I see how
enthusiastically they interact with software and hardware applications.
I wanted to find out how my experiences were shared by other music
educators, so I designed a questionnaire that addressed six categories:
1) how the lab was established, 2) budgeting, 3) inventory of
hardware and software, 4) curriculum, 5) set up, maintenance and
enrollment ideas, and 6) future developments for their labs. Thirteen
music educators responded representing elementary, middle and
high schools. I am happy to report that the information they provided
was insightful and will encourage your interest in a computer
lab.
For the sake of definition, I defined a computer music lab as
a minimum of two workstations that are dedicated to computer music
technology instruction. To my surprise, the average computer music
lab in this survey was 22 workstations with MIDI keyboards. Some
of these music labs began as early as 1987 with the latest starting
up within the last two years. Some labs used only keyboard workstations.
There was one with a Palm PDA lab of 30 workstations, but most
had traditional computers with MIDI keyboards. The most prevalent
applications were sequencing and notation. Classes varied from
one music technology class a day to several daily classes. The
following music educators participated in this survey, representing
12 states: Dennis Mauricio of Hilltop High School in Chula Vista,
Calif.; Bryan Bogue of the Libby Center in Spokane, Wash.; Scott
Lard of the North Carolina School of Science and Math in Durham,
N.C.; Richard Smith from North Northwest Classen High School in
Oklahoma City, Okla.; Sarah Bush Randolph from Kelvin-Milne Grove
School (elementary/middle schools) in Lockport Dist. #91, Ill.;
Joe Chase from the Houston Independent School District in Houston,
Texas; David Osnowitz from the West New York School District in
West New York, N.J.; Mike Matthews from the Vista Middle School
in Las Cruces, N.M.; Sebastian Zubieta from the Ross School in
East Hampton, N.Y.; Wayne Splettstoeszer from Torrington High
School in Torrington, Conn.; Ken Simpson from Brookwood High School
in Snellville, Ga.; Brandon Pedigo of Plano East High School in
Plano, Texas; Tom Rudolph, from Haverford Middle School in Havertown,
Penn.
How They Got Started
While some schools’ labs came from the school budgets, most
used grants, music booster organizations and other creative financing
to get started. Joe Chase in the Houston Independent School was
fortunate to use funds from his school district’s instructional
technology division.
David Osnowitz in the West New York district started with eight
piano workstations in 2000. Then computer workstations were added
later. Funding came from the Information Systems Department for
the nine computers, monitors and software. The high school music
department budgeted for the Suzuki electric keyboards. The biggest
obstacle was the facility, which limited the number of workstations
possible. They used flat screen monitors to make more room for
all of the hardware.
Mike Matthews at Vista Middle School was fortunate to have money
supplied by a third phase technology bond and a technology grant.
With these grants, the entire lab was funded – 30 workstations
with computers networked through a Novell server and 30 Kawai
Z1000 MIDI keyboards.
Careless contractors gave Sebastian Zubieta wiring problems at
the Ross School, but a bigger challenge was coordinating between
the Information Technology folks responsible for computer system
setup and maintenance and music staff.
Ken Simpson of Brookwood High School started up a computer lab
with 13 students and eight computers in 1996 using matching funds
from the school and the county/state lottery.
Wayne Splettstoeszer at Torrington High School used a Title VI
grant in 1995 to fund six Macintosh computers with Kawai KC20
keyboards. Once the school saw that the program was worthwhile,
the lab was increased to 20 stations in the school’s renovation
project.
Tom Rudolph of Haverford Middle School started a lab with 32 Korg
X-3 keyboard stations using a grant with the district technology
coordinator.
Dennis Mauricio of Hilltop High School started his first music
tech lab in 1987 with seed money provided by the district to purchase
two synthesizers, an Apple computer with sequencing software,
a drum machine and a four track “portastudio.” Response
was so high that two sections of Music Technology were offered.
Sarah Bush Randolph, Kelvin-Milne Grove School, started with one
borrowed computer and Music Ace in 1997 and by 2000 – with
funds from a school referendum – gained a computer lab of
32 computers.
In 1989, Richard Smith of North Northwest Classen High School
taught in a school district that did not accept the idea that
a music program should have computers. He purchased his first
workstation with the proceeds of ice cream bars that he sold to
students during lunch. In 1998, a state agency donated 10 outdated
computers of which seven are still in use. Each of the five practice
rooms attached to the band has at least one workstation in it.
Bryan Bogue, Libby Center, established a gifted students lab for
grades five and six to teach music fundamentals with the use of
the Palm PDA. He received half of the PDAs with a grant from Palm,
Inc. and then budgeted for the rest.
Budgeting
Chase, of Houston, annually budgets for his lab with the Texas
technology allotment funds. Osnowitz, of West New York, accesses
available funds from the school’s Information Systems Department,
and so far he has gotten everything that he has requested. Matthews,
in Las Cruces, Simpson, in Snellville, Rudolph in Haverford, and
Zubieta in East Hampton maintain their music labs primarily through
school funds. Rudolph receives about $1,000 annually for repairs
and new equipment
.
Splettstoeszer, of Torrington, finds that budgets change every
year for technology so he needs to spend wisely and carefully
since there is no guarantee for annual budgets in the future.
Pedigo, of Plano, uses replacement/update budgets on a rotation
basis. Otherwise, there is no yearly budgeted maintenance for
the lab and less than a couple of hundred dollars goes to the
theory department annually.
Mauricio, in Chula Vista, has had major funding for the technology
program this past year due to the vision and commitment of the
district’s superintendent. Interest in expansion and funding
for the program increased when career and vocational options beyond
traditional musical performance were developed because music technology
and multimedia offer real career options. Creative funding through
a Carl Perkins Applied Technology and Vocational Act grant provided
most of the funding for the current facility at Hilltop High School.
The Carl Perkins grant is a federal level grant which requires
focus on applied technology and vocational opportunities. Qualifying
programs need to contain sequential courses that lead to a technical
career and provide access to special needs students.
Without minimizing the importance and value of a traditional music
program, it may be beneficial to make a cost comparison of a band
and technology program. An entire lab can be funded for about
the cost of one set of band marching uniforms. The uniforms are
used for special occasions while the lab can be used every day
by several classes. A complete student lab station can be purchased
for about the same price as a sousaphone. In the Hilltop High
School program, the music technology program has demonstrated
that repair costs have actually been lower than in the instrumental
music program. Synthesizers purchased eight years ago are still
working and in use. Lard, of Raleigh, is presently funding the
recording technology lab with an approximate school-sponsored
budget of $15,000 a year. Randolph, of Lockport, has an annual
budget of $500. Funding and finding facilities large enough to
house furniture, computers and wiring are her top two concerns.
Smith, of Oklahoma City, has no budget for his computers.
Inventory and What Works Best
Chase,
the Houston director, uses mid-range Yamaha keyboards and Sibelius
notation software in the district level labs. He teaches music
educators Sibelius and keyboarding/electronic evening music classes
for beginning students.
Osnowitz, the New Jersey director, is primarily running Sibelius
2.11, Finale 2003, and Band In-A-Box. He is still looking for
a sequencing program under Windows XP. His lab is connected to
the school server with full Internet connections. Furniture and
ventilation were problems due to no windows and only one A/C vent,
so the lab is frequently warm and uncomfortable. Sibelius and
Finale are essential software in these music labs.
Music Technology LabsMatthews, the New Mexico director, uses a
Novell network, which stores all of the students’ work.
The student has access to a music listening library with some
1,200 selections from classical, pops, oldies, jazz, country,
world and ethnic media. Hardware includes a Roland Analog/Digital
Converter, a recording booth with four channel sends and monitors,
a five-piece Roland MIDI drum set with sequencer, a 16-channel
digital mixing board and a 30-channel audio group lesson controller
for audio communication with students both individually and in
a group setting. Regularly used software includes Alfred’s
Essentials of Music Theory, levels 1, 2 and 3; Cakewalk Home Studio
for sequencing; Sibelius 2 for composition and arranging; PhotoScore
for scanning printed music; TDK Digital Mixmaster to burn CDs
from a collection and convert small MP3 files into large audio
Wave files for use on a CD player; Cool Edit Pro for editing Wave
files and sound clips; Music Match Jukebox for playing and converting
MP3/Wave files; Band In-A-Box, SmartMusic, Amadeus, and a Roland
RPC-3 AD/DA Converter recording package.
Zubieta, the New York director, has a two-year-old lab with 12
workstations all running Windows XP Professional. The keyboards
are Yamaha Clavinovas with alternative Roland Drum Controller.
Software inventory of major applications includes notation, sequencing,
theory, scanning, automatic accompaniment generators: Finale 2003,
Sonar 2.0 XL, Home Studio XL, Acid 4 and Pro Tools LE.
Simpson, the Georgia director, is using 16 iMacs paired with Roland
RS-5 synthesizers. Software includes Cakewalk’s Metro, Sibelius,
MiBAC Music Lessons 1 and 2 and Band In-A-Box. The lab is not
connected to the school server, thus no Internet.
Splettstoeszer, the Connecticut director, uses Band In-A-Box,
Master Tracks pro MIDI sequencing software, Cakewalk Pro Audio
9 Sequencing, Sonic Foundry’s Sound Forge 5.0 professional
editing software and Acid Pro 3.0 looped-based music creation
software and Microsoft Front Page. Special hardware consists of
a Mackie 1202 unpowered mixer, a Samson TM300 powered mixer, a
Tascam DA20 D.A.T. recorder, a Tascam MKII analog tape deck, an
Alesis SR-16 drum machine, a Roland BR-1180CD digital recording
studio, a Roland VS-880 Digital Studio workstation and Roland
XP-10 keyboards.
Rudolph, the Pennsylvania director, incorporates Finale Notepad,
Freestyle sequencing software and Music Ace and Music Ace 2 software.
The biggest challenges for his music tech program are in selecting
the best hardware and finding teaching materials for the curriculum.
Pedigo, the Plano (Texas) director, uses software mostly in lab
packs such as: Finale 2000, MacGAMUT 2000, MiBAC Music Lessons
3.0, Music lessons 2, Practica Musica 4, Auralia 1.0, MicroLogic
AV, iTunes. Hardware includes 21 workstations with CD-RW capability,
Roland EP-9 or similar keyboards, Roland JV-1010 or similar sound
module, and much more.
Mauricio, the California director, has amassed a lot of hardware
and software since 1987. The Music Tech Ensemble is the most visible
part of the music tech lab and is responsible for most of its
high visibility even though its curriculum is one of the best
in the entire country for a high school. Current instrumentation
for the ensemble consists of eight keyboards, an electronic drum
set, two percussion octapads, two electric guitars, bass guitar,
a MIDI wind controller, vocals and a seven-piece brass section.
All of the instruments and microphones are connected to a 32-channel
mixer via a 125-foot audio snake cable and are powered by a 2,000-watt
sound system. There are two monitor mixes for the performers –
one is for vocal floor monitors and the other is for the musician’s
side fill monitors.
Lard, the North Carolina director, uses Alesis ADAT recordings
and studio 24 consoles, Steinberg Cubase and Wavelab Editing software
(PC), Zoom RFX 1000 effects processors, various dynamics processors,
AKGC1000 and SM 57 and 58 microphones and various other recording
equipment.
Randolph, the Illinois director, operates 32 PCs with Music Ace
1 & 2 and Sibelius/Scorch and Neuratron PhotoScore network
site licenses as the main core, plus Band-In-A-Box and Microsoft
Office PowerPoint. Her hardware includes a Hewlett Packard scanner.
Smith, the Oklahoma director, has eight computers with five MIDI
keyboards connected. He has no Internet connection or any networking
capabilities in the computer lab, but he has a long network cable
from his office that connects a single machine when needed. The
computer in his office is used for music production work. His
program’s software includes Sibelius 2, Musition, Auralia
and Alfred’s Essentials of Music Theory.
Bogue, the Washington director, uses a unique concept of music
technology: he does it all with Palm PDA handheld computers with
30 workstations. Music software runs only $175 to $400 a workstation
and includes handouts, tone module and software. This is about
one-tenth of the usual cost of $2,000 to $3,000 per workstation.
The Palm, Handspring and Sony Clie N and T series PDAs all work
well. He uses a Swivel Systems tone module attached to the Palm
III PDAs and the Beat Plus tone module in the Handspring. The
Sony Clie has the tone module built in. The software is from MiniMusic.
It includes BugBand for note reading, NotePad for music writing
and BeatPad for learning rhythm. He is working with a beta program
called EarTrain for learning intervals.
Curriculum and Enrollment
Osnowitz, of New Jersey, teaches two classes in music technology
during the school day. The music technology class is a five-credit
class that meets five days a week for 40 minutes each day. Students
learn the basics of MIDI, music copying, scanning and other music-writing
methods with computers and electric keyboards. This class fulfills
the fine arts requirement. Sibelius is the most popular software
application because of its ease of use. Currently there are 12
students enrolled in the two music tech classes.
Matthews, of New Mexico, offers six sections of music technology,
which are taught daily. Up to 30 students attend each class and
every student must also be enrolled in a traditional music class.
With Zubieta, of New York, the lab is used for regular classes
during the school day and in the evening classes are offered for
adults in the community. Presently, there are three courses available:
Music Composition and Performance, Senior Project, and Integrated
Projects.
Simpson, of Georgia, mostly uses sequencing programs to create
original projects for his school’s broadcasting class. Students
also create CDs each semester that they market to the community
as a fundraiser/service project. Students can take intro, intermediate
or advanced music tech classes during the school day. It is interesting
to note that a substantial number of the music tech students are
not formally trained and would not use a notation program, so
several students start off with Band-In-A-Box. Enrollment presently
includes 64 intro students, 24 intermediate students and 18 advanced
students along with 11 Advanced Placement music theory students.
Splettstoeszer, of Connecticut, offers two music tech classes.
Music Technology 1 is an introductory course that starts students
with basic principles of the sound system, including microphones,
speakers, effects processors, analog and digital audio tape machines.
Students then learn the who, what, when, where and why about MIDI
(Musical Instrument Digital Interface). Students use Band-In-A-Box
MIDI accompaniment software to create rhythm sections and learn
about chord progressions and how to create lead sheets. After
Band In-A-Box, students study basic sequencing techniques using
Cakewalk’s Pro Audio 9 sequencing software. Students explore
basic recording principles such as looping and over-dubbing while
creating original compositions using both MIDI and audio. Music
Technology II is an advanced course that focuses on real-world
applications of music technology. Students start by creating soundscapes
and studying the Art of Foley. Students use a passage from a short
story or poem and compose original music and sound effects. Next,
the students create radio jingles –15, 30 and 45-second
commercials on everything from Music Technology class (a great
recruiting tool) to going out into the community to produce a
commercial for an area business. Students are the artists/composers/producers/recording
engineers with the final product recorded onto digital audio tape
or compact disc for the customer. Students then dive into the
world of film scoring. Here, students take small clips from movies
and/or television shows and create original scores. Students have
scored everything from the opening credits to the “X-Files”
to “Star Trek Deep Space Nine.” As a culminating project,
students create an electronic portfolio in the form of a Web site
that includes all the projects and topics studied throughout the
course. Each project has its own page with student-created descriptions
of the project, resource links, and examples of their work. Because
of the hands-on nature of these courses, enrollment has increased
dramatically. An initial offering of one class with five students
the first year has now become multiple sections of two courses
with a waiting list. Music technology classes have become the
fastest-growing courses at Torrington High School.
Rudolph, of Pennsylvania, uses keyboards primarily for teaching
basic keyboard skills and some sequencing applications to all
sixth- and seventh-grade students. They meet two days per week
for class and one of those days is in the lab. He schedules 1,200
students per week and would go into the lab every period if he
could. He also teaches basic improvisation skills and integrates
the performance materials with the knowledge units from general
music. The biggest obstacles are the length of time it takes to
learn how to use the group education controller hardware, and
the frequent updates and repairs that are needed to keep up with
1,200 students per week. The headphones need to be replaced and
keyboards need to be serviced every summer.
Pedigo, of Plano, Texas, uses MP3s with iTunes for dictation.
He records dictation files on MP3s. Since each student has access
to the files while in the lab, they can always make up missed
examples outside of class. The teacher also distributes the assignments
as Finale files that the students can print for grading. The teacher
also likes to use Finale for analysis with Roman numeral chords
and custom-created articulation marks to identify non-chord tones.
Mauricio, of California, offers six classes in music technology
involving 50 students with Music Technology 1/2, Music Engineering
1, Advanced Music Engineering, Music Business Productions 1, Web
Design/Multimedia Arts and Music Tech Ensemble. The Music Technology
1/2 class introduces students to basic keyboard skills, music
fundamentals and music technology. Music fundamentals are taught
three days a week and music technology units are taught two days
a week. Some of the music technology units include History of
Electronic Music, Physics of Sounds, Subtractive and Digital Synthesis,
Computers and Digital Sampling, Multi-track Recording and MIDI.
Students also learn how to use sequencing, notation and digital
audio recording software. Music Engineering 1 is an entry-level
course that focuses on the technical side of the music industry
instead of music performance. Units of study include sound systems,
microphones, signal processing, physics of sound and multi-track
recording. Music Business 1 is a business applications course
that covers using a word processor, database and spreadsheet,
as well as job interviewing and business telephone etiquette.
Job roles such as producers, managers, booking agents, music contractors
and sound engineers are also studied. Other topics include copyright
forms, band contracts and payroll, music publishing, royalties
and career opportunities in the music industry. Multimedia is
another entry-level course. It includes Web page design and the
Internet. This class teaches how to create multimedia, presentation
and Web page design projects using authoring programs such as
HyperStudio, PowerPoint and Netscape Composer. Students can develop
their creative and technology skills with interactive projects
while being prepared for a possible career in a rapidly emerging
field.
Lard, of North Carolina, offers two classes. The introductory
class includes physics of sound, basics of acoustics, microphone
theory, over-dubbing theory and practice, the mixer and mixing
theory and basic effects processing/mastering and digital editing.
The advanced course includes advanced digital editing, dynamics
processing, studio session protocol, analyzing recordings, analog
recordings, DAW recording and product and brand recognition.
Randolph, of Illinois, currently offers grades K-8 music theory,
ear-training, music history, classical music selections, piano
instruction and composition instruction to 350 students in a general
music setting. What makes her teaching situation unusual is that
her school is registered through the Illinois State Board of Education
as a teacher-training site for music technology, offering teachers
CPDUs for teacher re-certification.
Smith, of Oklahoma City, is presently working on adding an Introduction
to Music and Music Technology course.
Bogue, of Washington, offers music rhythm, ear-training, theory
and composition activities in his middle school setting. He discusses
a concept and then turns the students loose in the lab to explore
the possibilities.
Future Developments For Their Labs
Chase, of Houston, has a music tech lab that serves as a model
for the district’s campuses. Their schools have dying music
programs but music technology is revitalizing music education
in the Houston Independent School District.
Osnowitz, of New Jersey, wants sequencing to be added to the curriculum
next year. Putting student work onto the school’s Web site
will also be considered. His advice is to get the best computers
with the most RAM memory available and offer a Mac lab in conjunction
with PCs if there is room and money. Have a large enough room
to expand the numbers of stations to accommodate the growing demand
for the courses. The facility should also be well-ventilated as
the computers heat up the room. Get as much software as possible
for notation and sequencing.
Matthews, of New Mexico, was fortunate when his school district
passed a major bond issue that will allow a new music wing to
be built. This will include a major addition to the existing music
tech lab of 30 workstations. He recommends that you preview software
before purchasing. There are many software packages that promise
to deliver but too many well-packaged gimmicks can cause a lot
of grief and waste of valuable funds. Make sure that software
is compatible with your computer environment – workstations,
network server, etc.
Zubieta, of New York, advises you to keep things as simple as
possible. Whatever devices may fail will invariably fail, at least
occasionally. He would like to expand the lab with more Digi001
systems in the future.
Simpson, of Georgia, suggests that a network server be used to
save student files and that more digital audio workstations be
made available. Funding is an important issue to include training
and tech support.
Splettstoeszer, of Connecticut, is going to include student work
on the school Web site during the next school year. The site does
not offer audio capabilities via audio or video streaming. He
wants to explore the possibilities of using Smartboard technology,
and upgrading computers and MIDI guitar in his program.
Rudolph, of Pennsylvania, would like to add computers to every
keyboard station and to move the lab from the band room to a separate
classroom so more electives are available for students in music
technology.
Pedigo, of Plano, Texas, is going to contact record companies
about the possibility of mechanical licensing fees so that he
can import all of the CDs that the theory program owns onto the
hard drives to create a listening library at every workstation.
He is also hoping to have his entire curriculum and all assignments
posted to the school’s Web site by the beginning of the
2003-2004 school year, or by the end of the present school year.
He recommends that you use plain old desks. His students have
to do all of their work while sitting at the workstation. There
is no comfortable writing surface, and the computers block their
line of sight.
Lard, of North Carolina, would like to expand to Pro-Tools and
continue to upgrade microphones and equipment.
Randolph, of Illinois, is now building a music technology lab
separate from the current computer lab. This lab is being built
one station at a time as funds become available so she will have
a completely separate lab from the general computer lab in her
school.
Smith, of Oklahoma, is pursuing donations for more and newer computers.
When completed, he should have 20 to 25 networked workstations
in a classroom. SmartMusic 7 is the next planned software acquisition.
Bogue, of Washington, notes that his PDA lab is very low maintenance
and very cost-effective. He is hoping to continue exploring how
music is constructed. He would very much like to get together
with some programmers to develop some programs for learning instrument
fingerings for band students.
Closing Comments
These are exciting developments – “mega trends,”
if you will. We can learn a lot from these 13 innovative music
educators who are successfully teaching in music tech lab situations.
Obviously, they are excited about their teaching situations and
optimistic about the growth and development of their students.
Several of these teachers have their own school Web sites where
you can learn more about their music technology programs:
•
Mike Matthews, Las Cruces, N.M.: www.zianet.com/mmatthews/musictech
• Wayne Splettstoeszer of Torrington, Conn.: www.thsmusic.net/tech.htm
• Brandon Pedigo of Plano, Texas: http://k-12.pisd.edu/schools/planoeast/musictheory/home.html
• Dennis Mauricio of Chula Vista, California at: http://Hhs.suhsd.k12.ca.us/musictech/hhsmusictechpages/MTProgramHistory.html
It is exciting to see how music technology is electrifying teaching
environments and at a cost that can revitalize the traditional
band program. Bryan Bogue’s PDA program in Spokane, Wash.,
proves that a computer music program can be very affordable with
good entry-level programs especially appropriate for the elementary
and middle school levels. But don’t shortchange PDA technology.
Central Washington University in Ellensburg, Wash., has a very
viable composition program on PDAs. Regardless of which direction
you explore – be it keyboards, PDAs or a traditional computer/MIDI
keyboard lab situation – it’s a great springboard
and inspiration.
top